The graph illustrates the global prices of food and oil during the period of 2000 – 2011.
It is noticeable that the food and oil had a parallel trend in the 11-year period with the correlation of 93.6% between two items. Furthermore, food and oil experienced a considerable rise although many price fluctuations can be seen during those 11 years.
To begin with, food price index gradually rose from the beginning of the year 2000 to the year of 2007, from 90 points to nearly 140 points. The followed years showed a sharp climb of food price index which rocketed from 140 points and reached 220 points in the middle of 2008. Surprisingly, the index plunged to the same point of 2007, which was 140 then increasingly fluctuated until the middle of 2010. Eventually, the index of food price soared to the highest point of almost 240 scores at the end of the period.
The similar trend can be seen in the change of oil prices during the years. A steady increase trend was shown from 2000 to 2007. After that, the oil price reached a peak in the middle of 2008 with approximately $130 per barrel. The later trend indicated a dramatic fall of oil price, which was from $130 down to around $50 in 2009 before it recovered to nearly $100 per barrel in 2011.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-21 | theresa_trangnguyen | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn the factsUse specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- ZoosSome critics contend that keeping animals in zoos is inhumane and must be changed. They believe that zoos are unnatural and provide no real benefit to society besides providing entertainment at the expense of the animals involved. The truth is that zo 75
- Some people believe that if a police force carries guns this encourages higher level of violence in that society To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53333333333 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45769650462 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6303898051 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264809817263 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111719628748 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537979399411 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184345836501 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415040110052 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.