The employment process in companies mostly requires series of interviews which involves personal data of an applicant. Although many believe that asking much of the personal side of an individual applying for a job might not be helpful, I certainly stand to believe that it should be included because of the complexities in the events in the lives of the people nowadays, performance and attendance will most likely be affected when hired. Whether to include these information or not, these may or may not benefit an individual.
A holistic view of an individual is relevant to a company. Mostly, people with healthy being is best preferred. Hobbies, interest, and social status are just pieces of information of an employee. However, employers can determine what makes up a good employee by these things. For example, people with same interests helps to build teamwork and can probably be best enhanced through team building. To produce efficient and effective team members, one should be able to observe how these members interact harmoniously.
On the other hand, collecting these data seem to demand people to give access to their personal being which seems unfair for most people. For example, an employer might take advantage when an individual is single, hence use the power to use an employee for pleasure. Another thing is religion. Religiously conscious individuals might not get along with people of another religion and it can possibly give bad results to the company.
In general, providing more personal data can both be helpful and harmful at the same time. Nevertheless, I still stand in my opinion of maintaining personal information as mandatory, to achieving success of companies in the future. All that is needed to bring this outcome is respect and professionalism.
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.Dis 61
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.Di 33
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children?You should use your own 56
- WRITING TASK 1You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows howthese causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the infor 78
- Many people believe that social networkingsites (such as Facebook) have had a hugenegative impact on both individuals and society.To what extent do you agree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The employment process in companies most...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...affected when hired. Whether to include these information or not, these may or may not benefit an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 390, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
... with people of another religion and it can possibly give bad results to the company. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, may, nevertheless, so, still, another thing, for example, in general, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26206896552 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8559219406 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593103448276 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3541632413 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.375 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252408734291 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708457573673 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504773364569 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146321518377 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390588495828 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.