Undoubtedly, succeed in developing of a country depends on various dimensions. Education can be mentioned as a factor that government try to spend money on it. Some people believe that government should spend money in university while others disagree. From my estimation i think that it is more important that governement consentrat their monitory resources on children because of being basic element of educational system, altering what ever they want and blossoming in future .
Firstly, children are the basic part of pedagogic system. Spending on them is an essential work for evolving a country. Although universities are the most important part of educational system, governments should not focus on them. By spending money on children, each country can strike their basin of education's pyramid. A glance at a developed countries in education reveals that many points in terms of spending money for children such as Finland. Many years ago, they decided to promote their education system and planed a developing sketch for future. Today's they are one the best successful country in the world in terms of children education. Therefore it seems it will be better that government spend more money for educating children than that of universities.
admittedly, children's mind is similar to liquid which can shape immediately when placed in every molds. According to the psychologist, children can be altered before 10 years old conveniently and after that this process may be come hard thus it will be more reasonable for government to provide some source of money and facilities to shape children's mind in profitable methods. Some students in university in many countries are aged for changing and forming their mind hence spending money in university should be adequate not higher than children developing budget.
Finally, blossoming in a country have not occurred randomly. Some socialists believe that children are the future of a country. I t means that every child can be considered as a potential for government and can be a gear of evolution system in the next few years. Children can be acquired different skills by government that in the future they give back this investment to their societies. Consequently, progression in a country will depends on who much spend money on children.
In sum, due to aforementioned reasons i believe that compared to universities , spending money on children will be more useful. however the government have to not be unaware from increasing the universities budget.
- tpo 36 3
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 76
- tpo 23 3
- TPO 36 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities 41
- tpo 23 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ile others disagree. From my estimation i think that it is more important that go...
^
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onitory resources on children because of being basic element of educational syste...
^^
Line 1, column 470, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ring what ever they want and blossoming in future . Firstly, children are the basic pa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 479, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... ever they want and blossoming in future . Firstly, children are the basic part...
^^
Line 3, column 650, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e world in terms of children education. Therefore it seems it will be better that governm...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Admittedly
...children than that of universities. admittedly, childrens mind is similar to liquid wh...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n system in the next few years. Children can be acquired different skills by gov...
^^
Line 7, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ext few years. Children can be acquired different skills by government that in t...
^^
Line 9, column 39, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... In sum, due to aforementioned reasons i believe that compared to universities ,...
^
Line 9, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... i believe that compared to universities , spending money on children will be more...
^^
Line 9, column 129, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... money on children will be more useful. however the government have to not be unaware f...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: however,
... money on children will be more useful. however the government have to not be unaware f...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28358208955 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94911174297 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492537313433 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 663.3 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9947954719 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5454545455 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.5376344086 217% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.