Some people think the air travel should be restricted because it causes environment pollution. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and relevant examples.
It is a widely held belief that planes damage air pollution and number of daily flights should be cut down, but there are strong counter arguments by a section of people who do not back up this idea. In my opinion, this matter should be debated in the light of several factors before any conclusion can be drawn
First and foremost, in the modern era are aircrafts play crucial role for people since it saves passengers’ time and lets them get quickly to long distances. Moreover, planes are tremendous bridge between continents that ameliorate quality of life. For example, distance between Kazakhstan and USA is about five hundred thousand kilometer. As a result, this is ridiculous to think that passengers are able to get by bus, train or chip, so in this circumstances, air travel is inevitable.
Secondly, flights ensure heavy goods procurement and deliver enormous commodities fast throughout Earth. For instance, ship cargo spends ten days, even month between harbors in order to bring items while plane cargo needs at least one or two day for that mission.
On the other hand, air travel has its own drawbacks. Everyday hundreds thousands passenger and cargo plane fly in the air and this phenomenon damage ozone and atmosphere. As a result, air pollution deteriorates and this cause leads to global warming and fauna deaths. According to NASA, the scope of ozone aggravates and the Antarctica and Arctic Oceans band is melting every year.
In my opinion, in order to stop this affliction researchers should devise some solution to protect environment and save the flights number.
In conclusion, although there are a number of different points of view regarding this matter, I claim that air travel should be developed further since this is a one of the vital necessary for them. Moreover, global countries and international organizations have to accept programs that preserve flora and fauna.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-24 | Russportkz | 47 | view |
- In many countries, young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities. What do you think are reasons of these? Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- Some believe that more academic subjects, such as chemistry, physics, and history, should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. Discuss both 84
- Many people believe the government should spend money on faster public transport. Others think that money should be spent on different aspects of public transportation, such as cost reduction and environment conservation. Discuss both views and give your 95
- Some people believe that manufacturers should be responsible for reducing the large amounts of packaging they use Others say consumers should avoid buying heavily packaged items Discuss both views and state your opinion Give reasons for your answer and in 42
- Some people believe that looking after our health is a duty to the society we live in rather than a personal need. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ble to get by bus, train or chip, so in this circumstances, air travel is inevitable...
^^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ircumstances, air travel is inevitable. Secondly, flights ensure heavy goods pro...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
...le. Secondly, flights ensure heavy goods procurement and deliver enormous commod...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12101910828 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74658219264 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633757961783 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8252100904 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.857142857 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163639962921 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515681527444 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493585679601 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847588819732 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513570586577 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.