People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group.
A glance at a person's attitude toward a criticism by others brings to light question that has several times provoked discussions, that is, whether those who accept other people's criticism is more successful at doing group working. Some might contend that caring about what others are saying is not a crucial thing in group assignment, thus getting success has nothing to do with the acceptance of criticism. However, I would like to suggests that people are likely to success more if they do take care more about what others are saying, in terms of one's improvement and good relationship.
First and foremost, people who listen to other people's advice has more chance of improvement. It's common for those successful CEO that they do listen to their employee's comment on the working environment and things about the company operation. Those who are successful do not take other people's advice personally, but instead as a precious chance to improve one's business. As a result, the whole group of people manages to successfully run a company and earn a lot of fortune.
Secondly, people who do take care about other people's saying is less likely to hurt other people. People who are too sensitive to other's criticism often show an aggressive reaction when they are commented on their misbehavior or bad decision, thus makes the advisor embarrassed. This is not helpful specially when a group of people is pursuing one goal because the awkward atmosphere always disturbs the group process. Slowly members will try not to correct other people's behavior because no one wants to get hurt by shrill reaction given to their brave decision of offering advice.
Last but not the least, people who take criticisms and correct their mistakes gets a huge chance of self-actualization. They do better understand about how the world progress and people make success in their professions like global business, art and culture, academic theory and et cetera. They understand that people who reached the top of their career must have willingly accepted a lot of criticism in their past life. Resultingly, they attain a high enlightenment about the world and themselves and can become actively involved in their community.
Due to the aforementioned ground, I firmly believe that accepting other people's criticism makes people do a better job of their group and community work, and the improvement and the good relationship are two prime and conspicuous reasons.
- People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment – doing things they like to do – rather than doing things they should do. 90
- Agree of disagree Telling truth is better than lying under any circumstances 100
- Most change is not necessarily progress 59
- In general, people are living longer now. Discuss the causes of this phenomenon. Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 97
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
A glance at a persons attitude toward a criticism by others b...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'suggest'.
Suggestion: suggest
... of criticism. However, I would like to suggests that people are likely to success more ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 550, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...out what others are saying, in terms of ones improvement and good relationship. Fir...
^^^^
Line 2, column 358, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...instead as a precious chance to improve ones business. As a result, the whole group ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10473815461 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76832691939 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521197007481 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6458281224 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.9375 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0625 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389387448019 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145768511392 0.076458572812 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806035931232 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238788389751 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475619396805 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.002688172 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.