Wastage production is increasing day by day. The main reason behind this is people producing these wastes do not know the adverse effects of these waste materials. There are many solutions which should be implemented by government to reduce the wastage and control the garbage.
Firstly, the reason for rise in the rubbish level is due to lack of awareness among the humans who are throwing them. Increase in unwanted wastes in society not only effect the present generation but also, the future generations. Government should organize few programs to educate citizens about the harmful effects of throwing the waste materials on to the road. Similarly, state should dispose the wastes properly in order to reduce the pollution caused by the wastes.
Another point to consider is instead of throwing waste food otherwise extra food on to the roads they can donate to the people who are in need, by doing so the wastage from food can be reduced. On the other hand, government should allocate volunteers to collect these waste food and supply to poor citizens. However instead of disposing, donating will make the better use of extra foods.
Thirdly, imposing fine on the organisations which produces the large amount of useless material can result in reduction of rubbish quantity produced by an industry. In addition, government should also encourage people by giving rewards to the home which produces the least amount of waste in the city. Advertising about the issues of throwing wastes will help people in knowing the effects.
In conclusion, organizing programs and bringing awareness among the citizens can help to limit the amount of rubbish produced. Moreover, government should take incentives in reducing the wastes thus benefits the society. Likewise citizens should intend not to waste foods and limit the other disposal wastes.
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit 50
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for t 50
- Some people think children can learn effectively by watching TV and they should be encouraged to watch TV at both home and school. To what extend do you agree and disagree? 56
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan. 73
- Some people think children can learn effectively by watching TV and they should be encouraged to watch TV at both home and school. To what extend do you agree and disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[7]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... in unwanted wastes in society not only effect the present generation but also, the fu...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 222, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...g the wastes thus benefits the society. Likewise citizens should intend not to waste foo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, likewise, moreover, similarly, so, third, thirdly, thus, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21812080537 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5560449163 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526845637584 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3545700579 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1875 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171884572094 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565017548836 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543613415924 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102886770879 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400022714303 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.