In preceeding argument, the author asserts that Prunty County should take the same measures as Butler County to lower the rate of traffic accidents, citing a failure in lower speed limit and the success of controlling accidents in Butler County. At first glance, the recommendation may sound logical and plausible; however, a closer scrutiny reveals that the author\'s claimations are not supported by the evidence proffered above.
To begin with, additional information need to be attained in answering whether lowering speed limit could diminish the number of accidents or not. For instance, it is possible that the fact that many drivers are exceeding the speed limit may lead to the high accident rate. Therefore, it might be advisable for the authority of Prunty County to compare the number of accidents between drivers exceeding the speed limit and those not. Alternatively, Prunty County could impose harsher punishment for malfeasanse, and then calculate the accident rate.
In addition, even if a lower speed limit could not reduce the number of accidents, this does not necessarily mean that Prunty County should follow exactly what Butler County had done. The rate of traffic accidents is affected by multifarious factors, speed of driving being only one of them, and concrete evidence need to be shown that in what areas Prunty County is outperformed by Butler County. Arguably, if roads in Prunty County are already wider than those in Butler County and are in better condition as well, it would be useless to improve the roads. Therefore, the policy to lower accident rate should be aimed at solving the most urgent problems of at Prunty County.
Last not least, we still need to know if the dwindled number of accidents in Butler County are truly the result of the improvement on roads. In the argument, the author does not effectivelly rule out other possibilities that could be attributed the lower number of accidents at Butler County in the five years, during which accidents decreased by one fourth. It might be the fewer number of cars on the roads in Butler County that lowered the number of accidents, for instance. To do so, a thorough investigation and analysis need to be carried out before making any conclusion.
In sum, while it may be true that Prunty County ought to solve the problem of high number of accidents, but professing the failure of a lower speed limit and the copy of seemingly successful policies taken by Butler County makes exact evidence wanting. Otherwise, the valuation of the statment by the author are definitely to be undermined.
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- TPO-29 - Integrated Writing Task Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska's North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold,arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep t 74
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 28.8173652695 66% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 55.5748502994 119% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2166.0 2260.96107784 96% => OK
No of words: 428.0 441.139720559 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06074766355 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67899686343 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 204.123752495 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453271028037 0.468620217663 97% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 705.55239521 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4796359627 57.8364921388 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.375 119.503703932 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 23.324526521 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 5.70786347227 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245031593393 0.218282227539 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102259283899 0.0743258471296 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603041093462 0.0701772020484 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161487954753 0.128457276422 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269073575357 0.0628817314937 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.3799401198 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.5979740519 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 98.500998004 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.