The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree
with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take.
In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in
which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and
explain how these examples shape your position.
Teaching is an art which needs to be handled extremely carefully because it breaks or makes someone’s life. A Human being develops through learning and hence, teaching becomes an influencing factor. The way someone is taught should be paid with proper attention. There are multiple forms of teaching which vary from person to person.
Here, the author has proposed that the best form of teaching is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. Whenever positive actions are concerned, they should always be praised. This gives a moral confidence to the learner and creates a sense of self-confidence within him/her. It paves way for innovative thinking and at the same time gives the audacity to the person to try newer and unconventional things which may lead to an entirely new path ahead and also may open gateways to human exploration.
But at the same time, the negative ones should also not be ignored. By ignoring the faulty actions, the learner will never be able to realize his/her mistakes. This may create a false notion that the way he/her acts is always going to be true. The wrong actions should be, in fact, deeply evaluated. Evaluation will lead to realising the mistakes that have been done and ways in which those could be rectified. Ignoring the wrong action will keep the person ignorant forever and will lead to self-destruction. Actually, long-term learnings are learned through the mistakes than the successful actions. One of the notorious example of ignoring the negative action is Adolf Hitler. He may have, at a certain point of time, conquered the entire European continent but due to certain false actions like conquering Russia in harsh, cold winter and refuting to accept the consequences brought down his entire ambitions in no time. There were people who guided him during the course but due to their incapability of making him realize of his wrong actions lead to the ultimate defeat of the Axis powers.
In the conclusion, it is fair to say that teachings should not be only about praising the positive actions but also making the learner realize about the wrong doings. This will create a balanced mindset of the learner which will definitely prove successful in the long term.
- In some countries, teenagers have jobs while they are still students. Do you think this is a good idea? Support your opinion by using specific reasons 70
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagreewith the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take.In developing and supp 58
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrolment is growing and, based on current t 50
- People work because they need money to live. What are some other reasons that people work? Discuss one or more of these reasons. Use specific examples and details to support your answer. 58
- Schools should cut funding for extracurricular activities such as sports and the arts when school buildings are in need of repair Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this recommendation and explain your rea 30
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, if, may, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61705939642 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.5169278559 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166849528143 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578834417302 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057777006064 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116557843512 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037890054535 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.