the chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000.
The bar chart represents the minimum and maximum volume of SO2 and N2O being disposed in four major urban centres.
Overall, Mexico city was the most polluted city with the highest level of both air pollutants.
To begin with, an almost equal maximum volume of both S02 and N20 of approximately 200 microgram per m3 was observed in Mexico city, which was nearly twice the minimum amount of about 100 microgram per m3. Meanwhile, Los Angeles was highly contaminated with N2O, with the minimum and maximum N2O amount of 39 and 104 microgram per m3 respectively, whereas the max SO2 volume was only 10 microgram.
The second most polluted city was Beijing where the level of SO2 ranged from 25 to 130 microgram per m3, while of NO2 was between 14 and 54 microgram. Calcuta was polluted by a minimum of 47 microgram per m3 and a maximum of 59 microgram of SO2 and from 30 to 52 microgram of N2O.
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is to a job straight after school. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day
- Some people think that hosting international sports events may be beneficial for a country Discuss both views
- The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'microgram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'micrograms'.
Suggestion: micrograms
...f both S02 and N20 of approximately 200 microgram per m3 was observed in Mexico city, whi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'microgram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'micrograms'.
Suggestion: micrograms
...y twice the minimum amount of about 100 microgram per m3. Meanwhile, Los Angeles was high...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'microgram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'micrograms'.
Suggestion: micrograms
...um and maximum N2O amount of 39 and 104 microgram per m3 respectively, whereas the max SO...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'microgram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'micrograms'.
Suggestion: micrograms
... whereas the max SO2 volume was only 10 microgram. The second most polluted city was Bei...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 88, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'microgram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'micrograms'.
Suggestion: micrograms
... the level of SO2 ranged from 25 to 130 microgram per m3, while of NO2 was between 14 and...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'microgram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'micrograms'.
Suggestion: micrograms
... m3, while of NO2 was between 14 and 54 microgram. Calcuta was polluted by a minimum of 4...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'microgram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'micrograms'.
Suggestion: micrograms
...Calcuta was polluted by a minimum of 47 microgram per m3 and a maximum of 59 microgram of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'microgram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'micrograms'.
Suggestion: micrograms
...47 microgram per m3 and a maximum of 59 microgram of SO2 and from 30 to 52 microgram of N...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 263, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'microgram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'micrograms'.
Suggestion: micrograms
...f 59 microgram of SO2 and from 30 to 52 microgram of N2O.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, whereas, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 734.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55900621118 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54423463829 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540372670807 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8556422884 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153822564934 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104980181958 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597361158377 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130524747401 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584178856987 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.