In the past, people used to travel abroad to look many differences from their home country. Nowadays, the sceneries in places all over the world are more and more similar. What are the causes of the similarities? Do you think the advantages of this similarity outweigh the disadvantages?
Traveling abroad gives people opportunities to explore more about the world, however, the differences between all corners of the world are getting smaller due to many reasons. I personally think that the detrimental effects of this trend outweigh its benefits.
Firstly I will analyze the causes of these similarities. The first point to note is the resemblances in architecture, which is mainly caused by the assimilation for a very long time. For instance, Vietnam, a country in South East Asia, used to be a colony of China, France, and America for thousands of years. This has resulted in the existence of many French-styled buildings as well as those with Chinese style. Additionally, globalization has led to people’s imitation of lifestyles. Nowadays, the American lifestyle is very popular among young people. They try to catch up with American’s makeup styles, trendy clothes, and their life habits. Moreover, integration can also be considered as the cause of the appearance of skyscrapers, café shops, and restaurants, which are similar views that we can find in downtown areas in all big cities around the world. To demonstrate, KFC and McDonald’s chains can be seen in most parts of the world.
It can be clearly seen that this trend is accompanied with many negative aspects. First of all, every nation has their own cultural identities, which is our ancestor’s most treasurable heritage. Cultural globalization will gradually destroy the cultural diversity of each country. Also, this trend will also make global tourism pointless and boring since all places are becoming the same, tourists will be no longer interested in visiting other countries. Another point to note is the damage that globalization has done to the environment. To integrate, each country has to develop, industrialize to compete with others. This economic competition will consequently lead to environmental pollution because of the building of factories and high-rise buildings. Moreover, in the process of globalization, we produce a large number of advanced technologies, which are mostly imported from abroad. This will likely to make people rely on foreign technology and not put efforts in learning and researching.
In conclusion, the increase of similarities globally is caused by many factors and in my opinion, it brings more cons than pros.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-06-28 | lenguyenynhitk | 82 | view |
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 85
- TASK 1: the table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 78
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 78
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024. 73
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 819, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...he process of globalization, we produce a large number of advanced technologies, which are mostly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40810810811 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17433669299 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610810810811 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.057838384 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2857142857 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.619047619 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222018473992 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526159107403 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523129174476 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150488840291 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539698742221 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.