The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.
The charts compare the percentage of five sources to generate electricity in two countries, New Zealand and Germany from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that there were significantly differences between New Zealand and Germany I 1980 and 2010. While New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. While New Zealand had just four different categories of source to make electricity, the figure of the source of electricity generation in Germany were five itiems over the 30-year period.
In New Zealand, the proportion of coal accounted for the largest, from 56% of total 127 units in 1980 to 150% of total 200 units in 2010. In terms of petroleum and natural gas, the figures fell consistently to just 2% in 2010. In addition, the percentage of hydro went up slightly, by 16% from the 1980 figure of 80%.
As for Germany, the country witnessed the particularly consumption of nuclear to generate electricity. While this figure was just 20% in 1980 of, it was up to 155% in 2010. The figures for hydro in Germany in 2010 was only 2% of total 214 units, lower than that in New Zealand, 46% of total 200 units. Throughout the period of 30 years, the percentage of natural gas in both countries remained at 2%. Finally, there were little changes in the figures of the two remaining sources, coal and petroleum over the same period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Trang Carina | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | noor salah | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | Sơn Joyous | 67 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 76
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s fell consistently to just 2% in 2010. In addition, the percentage of hydro went ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73706896552 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64939684765 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478448275862 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6340992857 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5833333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38681368404 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16716341397 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16254445599 0.0843802449381 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302817969233 0.15604864568 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169728792447 0.0819641961636 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.