The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Italy, Sweden, Portugal between 1967 and 2007
The line graph illustrates the amount of polluted air carbon dioxide per person in the United Kingdom, Italy, Sweden, Portugal during the period from 1967 to 2007.
It is evident that the quantity of emissions in United Kingdom and Sweden decreased in the whole period, while it was a considerable growth in both Italy and Portugal.
In the first period from 1967 to 1977, there were increases in numberous polluted air in Italy, Sweden and Portugal at 2 metric tonnes per person. Meanwhile the United Kingdom's number of carbon dioxide in each person decreased slightly in this period.
Over the next thirty years, there were significant growth in both Italy and Portugal with 1 and 2 metric tonnes per person respectively. At that moment, there was a slight decline in United Kingdom's number of emissions per person. However, various polluted air dropped dramatically in sweden after it reached a peak in 1977.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Italy, Sweden, Portugal between 1967 and 2007 61
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Italy, Sweden, Portugal between 1967 and 2007 61
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph illustrates the amount of...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l during the period from 1967 to 2007. It is evident that the quantity of emiss...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble growth in both Italy and Portugal. In the first period from 1967 to 1977, t...
^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...Portugal at 2 metric tonnes per person. Meanwhile the United Kingdoms number of carbon di...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...son decreased slightly in this period. Over the next thirty years, there were s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 763.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01973684211 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54555958778 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532894736842 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6524080999 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414445713336 0.215688989381 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202453530058 0.103423049105 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132377121425 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282104694841 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130253440488 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.