The author argues that routine administration of inoculations to all people in areas where the disease is found might save a lot of lives and author also adds that there is a chance that a person may pass away due to periodic intake of inoculations. The above argument can be flawed because it relies on unsupported assumption.
Firstly, the author assumes that inoculations is the only cause for reduction of cow flu. Since the above assumption is not mentioned clearly what if the people in affected are aware of flu and started to take care about their health by following hygienic diet and doing regular work outs moreover by avoiding outside food. If the author would have mention clearly that people did not change their food habits and followed same diet before the flu affected the area and at present.
Another point to consider is that the author also presume that vaccination should be given routinely to all people. Since the above assumption is not mentioned clearly what if routine vaccination may lead to over dosage in children which may have negative affects. If author would have mention clearly that regular dosage to children and adults is same and it does not affect any one due to over dosage.
Thirdly, the author infer that many lives might be saved if inoculations is given regularly. Since the above assumption is not mentioned clearly what if many represent a hundred in a thousand or a six hundred in a eight hundred population. If the author would have mention clearly that how many people are saved due to vaccinationation instead of mentioning many.
Finally, the author surmise that there is a small possibility of a person to die due to regular intake of inoculations. Since the above assumption is not mentioned clearly what if people might have died due to accidents and also author did not mention the number of people died. If the author would have mention clearly that people died only because of regular in take of inoculations and the count of the humans died due to inoculations instead of mentioning a small number.
The author argument fails because it has following flaws statistical, causal, sampling. This can be fixed if author would have mention clearly about the number of people saved and the number of people died, inoculation is the only cure and clear data about dosage in routine administration.
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or dis 16
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or dis 75
- Some people think children can learn effectively by watching TV and they should be encouraged to watch TV at both home and school. To what extend do you agree and disagree? 56
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or dis 16
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ndred in a thousand or a six hundred in a eight hundred population. If the author...
^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... hundred in a eight hundred population. If the author would have mention clearly t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 55.5748502994 99% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 2260.96107784 87% => OK
No of words: 400.0 441.139720559 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9125 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65586026553 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 204.123752495 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4025 0.468620217663 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 636.3 705.55239521 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.70958083832 295% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4789173195 57.8364921388 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.8125 119.503703932 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.324526521 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.70786347227 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218805591198 0.218282227539 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913754736952 0.0743258471296 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684646895871 0.0701772020484 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135858718619 0.128457276422 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598072301278 0.0628817314937 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 98.500998004 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.