The issue stands with a point that, if people use more and more technology to solve problems, human will surely degrade their ability to think. In counter, then no new technology will evolve in future due to degradation of brains because of existing technology. In fact, the world has never gained such growth of technology that we have seen in past decade, which we call it technological age. I believe that if people include more and more technology to solve problems, humans can explore more and more new things and ultimately help them to improve ability to think.
Firstly, looking current world scenario the ongoing growth which we have never seen before in any field of science and even non-science field is due to involvement of more and more technologies. For example, today's smart phone's, no one had imagined a century ago that such personal computer will be there on hand of each people as a personal assistant which can help people to explore more at every stage. This reality is only possible due to involvement of technology to solve problems which help human to think more in depth and critically. So looking current world as a live proof, technology is the only one which helps human to improve its thinking capacity.
Secondly, one may argue that using technology as a daily needs make people lazy to do daily work and it is arguable but it all depends on people how one can adopt such use in a positive or negative way. Technology is not responsible for person's negative adoption in life. One may use technologies for its own benefits like very popular automobile company name Tesla who manufacture cars with automatic driving technology, using such technology they help people to avoid unnecessary fatigue of driving in daily life which helps them to work more freshly at any destination. Using technology at the right place can help to solve unnecessary problem and furthermore help human to think for actual problems.
In conclusion, technology involvement is one of the main factor for growth of current world. Using technology at right place can significantly help human to improve capacity to work. As mention support, technology involvement in solving problem is up-gradation for human thinking ability, not degradation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01866666667 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73781875871 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490666666667 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0799050065 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.466666667 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 5.21951772744 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420840917093 0.243740707755 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171339405327 0.0831039109588 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140999061119 0.0758088955206 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287029745228 0.150359130593 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128837033913 0.0667264976115 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.