Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
The statement claims that teaching moral values should be imperative in the era of education, whereas the other statement claims that teaching logical reasoning should be given more importance.
I partially agree with both the statement given above. Moral values are the foundation of our lives which makes us wise, however, logical reasoning is equally important to make us indigenous.
First, we will talk about moral values. Morality plays a significant role in our lives as without moral values no one can achieve for conviction. Moral values should be inherited from childhood. Teachings in childhood remain in sub conscience of children's mind till the rest of their lives. Morality becomes one of the strength when it is engraved in the genes, indeed, becoming an indispensable part of lives. Taking an example of our great leader, Mahatma Gandhi Ji, Right from the childhood, he was taught moral values, which lead to a great revolution in the country. It is the morality which lead our country to freedom. In 19th Century having greatest of knowledge, coming back from England in 1915, he showed to the people of India that moral values play the most important role in their lives to achieve anything.
Now talking about logical reasoning. Logical reasoning commensurate with morality. As morality is important, logical reasoning is also salient. Logical reasoning inherited in our teachings makes us an indigenous man with an intelligence. Taking the same example, Mahatma Gandhi took the leadership for the freedom of the country India indigenously. Without logical skills, no one would have done what Mahatma Gandhi Ji did. So whenever we talk about teaching morality, logical reasoning should come on its own. Both are imperative for the development of the brain of a child.
Coming to conclusion, Morality and Logical reasoning goes hand in hand. A moral society can be built not only be teaching just morality but also logical reasoning for continuous improvement of society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Opak Pulu | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | abhbat | 50 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 50
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'intelligence'.
Suggestion: intelligence
...achings makes us an indigenous man with an intelligence. Taking the same example, Mahatma Gandh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, whereas, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 14.8657303371 13% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 321.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23676012461 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73023058075 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520249221184 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5899758568 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0476190476 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2857142857 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356390260306 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104707984642 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871436950068 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222314085616 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835776677556 0.0667264976115 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.