Ecological balance is impossible to achieve when technological progress constantly ruins our environment. Do you agree?
It is strongly believe that humans can't achieve a balance in our ecological system as long as it is continuously devastated by technological progress. I am convinced, that this is true and we should pay more attention to our Mother Earth.
Everything that hurts our planet is associated with a progress in technology that the most of the inventors and builders strive to achieve. To illustrate that everything is connected, we should look into our daily lives and routines. In terms of communiting to schools or occupations, it is a crucial aspect of detrimental effect of exhaust fumes from cars, buses and other vehicles on quality of the environment. Moreover, heavy industry, particulary large factories are another concerning problem we should concentrate on. However, technological progress is not the only enemy that threatens our planet.
On the other hand, even an innocent people without any intentions in technological development harm the environment everyday, sometimes without knowing. One of the critical problem consist of littering the oceans, seas, lake or even forests. Not only that the animals will get hurt but the nature becomes terribly polluted. Furthermore, hunting and poaching causes the lack of biodiversity and without it, we can not ever achieve the balance in ecology.
In conclusion, we should carefully think about what we do in our everyday lives that harms our Mother Earth and does not contribute to the ecological balance. Technological developement is one side of the coin, while the actions of a person as an individual is the other and costs often the same amount of detriment to the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-22 | verunenka68 | 73 | view |
| 2014-12-26 | bwosti | 75 | view |
| 2014-10-21 | bocahnakal | 70 | view |
| 2014-06-13 | drjowelynt | 50 | view |
| 2014-06-10 | drjowelynt | 30 | view |
- The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U.S. state of Oregon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.Do you think the advanta 73
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for differents organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 79
- The graph below shows how prices of high tech gadgets changed over time in Somecountry 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
It is strongly believe that humans cant achieve a balance in o...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
It is strongly believe that humans cant achieve a balance in our ecological sys...
^^^^
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...hat hurts our planet is associated with a progress in technology that the most of the inve...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ogical development harm the environment everyday, sometimes without knowing. One of the ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, look, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23863636364 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04707244451 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598484848485 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2947018167 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.384615385 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226773063053 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076273336931 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767301270234 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140578938901 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057632029423 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.