In some parts of the world it is becoming increasingly popular to try to find out one's own family history. Why? Positive or negative?
Recent years have witnessed the rise in the searching for one’s own family background taken in many countries. This practice stems from various reasons, including internal and external factors influencing on the one who embarks on the idea. From my perspective, comprehending what our families have been through can benefit us in many ways.
The increasing popularity of family history investigation can be ascribable to the personal quest of their ancestors together with the motivation from mass media. Considered as human’s instinct, curiosity drives us to discover not merely the whole world surrounding us broadly but also our own generation insightfully. Through the research on the family tree associated with specific milestones, people can gain profound understanding ranging from who our former generations were and how deeply geographic and demographic factors shape the family spirit and traditions to how our own family distinguishes from others. Furthermore, mass media also promotes the inquiry into one’s own antecedents with the extra supply of tools and means of communications. While a plethora of newspapers keep publishing generation-related posts that sparkles the enthusiasm for family background, Internet enables us to grasp such a myriad of information within a blink. On a daily basis, some articles try to reveal the background of public figures just for arousing more views; consequently, this has fired the trend as more people wonder about their own family history as well.
Regarding its impacts, this trend exerts advantageous influences on personal and communal development. The gathered information about our own history may kindle the interest in family traditions and spirits. Therefore, people would take pride in their own cultural identity and find the way to maintain as well as to exhibit their distinct traits. In addition, discovering one’s own background can make the history lessons at schools more lively and practical in the way children are truly passionate for what happened in the past, especially for what relates to their roots.
In conclusion, the search for family background is gaining more and more publicity mainly thanks to the human’s curious mind and advanced technology. As people always strive for future achievements, comprehensive understanding about antecedents is the crucial key to keep the culture alive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-31 | baomap22000 | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that parents should be obliged to immunize their children against childhood disease. However, others think that individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Modern technology has a great impact on our environment. Some say that people should adopt a simple lifestyle to solve this problem, while others argue that the technology itself should provide a solution. 78
- In some parts of the world it is becoming increasingly popular to try to find out one's own family history. Why? Positive or negative? 84
- Given the high unemployment rate, it is recommended that the government only provide primary education and no secondary education. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 89
- What matters to you. And why? 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61538461538 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1046435766 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587912087912 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1807818254 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.266666667 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2666666667 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191212813987 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639196041875 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386460556094 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108921862045 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486290949044 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.