It is incontestable fact that medical health service and remedy are an inseparable part of any society and it has been required particular consideration.
However, it seems that there are some better ways for authority to spend taxpayers’ money such as developing a healthy lifestyle among people by public funds.
Budget cut in favor of healing put a strain on the overall economy, when spending on one specific purpose, in this case treatment, a huge money breeds negative effect and drawback on different categories.
Increasing the funds of ministry of health besides the reducing of subsidies for other organs are crystal example in this regard.
In compared with the traditional way of straightforward treatment, is it possible to searching a better path and substituting it? This is an unaccustomed question; Nonetheless, there can be found plenty of undercover pitfalls.
Healthy lifestyle should be encouraged by governments. There is irrefutable evidence that always prevention is better than cure due to many contributing factors and one of them is didactic program. This plan is the cheapest one and could be executed through the country.
An example to illustrate this point is the comprehensive programs of WHO (Word Health Organization) to preventing obesity and overweight in England and the United States of America.
Moreover, it is likely that governments’ plans in expending public finance would be better cost-effective. This, in spite of the fact that the amount received from fiscal policy is spent on lifestyle education, is a long-term investment type for the government.
Unlike the treatment which requires specialized expertise and equipment, healthy lifestyle is not related to any kind of ethnicity, time or place.
For instance, in Canada tax incentives have been introduced in 2007 to boost physical activity.
Therefore, I am quite convinced that spend public finance on healthful culture, provision train in this field and dedicate a huge sum of money could be beneficial. Although, other methods like hospitalization and treatment might be useful either.
- Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children suffer because they do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past.Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge money'.
Suggestion: huge money
...ecific purpose, in this case treatment, a huge money breeds negative effect and drawback on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... contributing factors and one of them is didactic program. This plan is the cheap...
^^
Line 12, column 37, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires specialized" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'specializing' or 'to be specialized'.
Suggestion: specializing; to be specialized
...t. Unlike the treatment which requires specialized expertise and equipment, healthy lifest...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, for instance, kind of, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49079754601 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19151105011 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61963190184 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1325440727 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.875 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.38176352705 251% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178856521824 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524364590457 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566406277684 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.064870252287 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628831901924 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.