Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of an international organization rather than each national government. Do you agree or disagree?
Recent decades have witnessed the intensification of climate change and many other environmental issues, raising many questions of ít impacts of the sustainability of humankind. Although it is proposed that an international organization be responsible for these green problems rather than each national government sounds legitimate, I disagree with this view.
On the one hand, it should be acknowledged that the responsibility of an international group for environmental issues could be fraught with pitfalls. Unlike the local government, an international organization is invariably associated with the exploitation of natural resources of the areas especially those in developing countries and ignore their environmental issues. In fact, many international groups coming to Vietnam to tackle the deforestation and animals’ habitat shrinking problems encounters the allegations of working in connivance with poachers to smuggle valuable woods to other neighbouring nations.
On the one hand, there are many advantages when it comes to the national government’s liability for environmental issues. First, the national administration could freely enact the legislations to address many green issues, which could not be seen in an international group. For example, Vietnamese official authorities have applied Carbon tax on many industrial parks with many manufacturing factories, thereby curbing the concentration of pollutant particles especially carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere. Second, the national government could capitalize on the mainstream media to inform citizens about the negative consequences of environmental problems and subsequently raise their awareness of environment protection. For instance, due to some programmes designed to alert people about some respiratory diseases stemming from climate change, there is a rise in the number of Vietnamese people participating in some tree-planting campaigns to restore damaged forests, contributing remarkably to the environmental rehabilitation of the nation.
In conclusion, I believe that the each national government should be liable for solving green problems instead of a multinational government due to some benefits of freely enacting laws and using media to raise citizens’ environment protection awareness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-25 | kiran pal9 | 11 | view |
| 2018-06-01 | drtruong92 | 61 | view |
| 2018-01-25 | mrymhmt | 84 | view |
| 2017-08-15 | grahamoneil | 86 | view |
| 2017-08-15 | grahamoneil | 93 | view |
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain. 78
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outwiegh the disadvantages? 11
- The given pie charts compare the expenses in 7 different categories in 1966 and 1996 by American Citizens 78
- Topic When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 71
- Some people think that killing animals for food is cruel, but others claim that animals are a necessary part of a diet. What is your opinion. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1993.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17027863777 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5696500447 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56346749226 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.4602083547 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.181818182 106.682146367 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3636363636 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30073326145 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119670658483 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106367184307 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197005027596 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704171396899 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.3 13.0946893788 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 16.66 50.2224549098 33% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.1 12.4159519038 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.78957915832 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.