Animal extinction due to human activities
It is undeniable that number of the wildlife species are declining day by day in our world. According to some people, this trend could be due to human activities. I am completely agree with this statement and we can take some action to control this extinction process.
There are various factors that contributed in species extinction. First of all, in some countries, people tend to hunt animals without obeying rules and regulations. For instance, a study have been shown that underdeveloped countries have more declining of animal populations, those countries have laws about hunting, but people are failed to follow them. Secondly, pollutions from the vehicles and airplanes are causing detrimental effects on wild species, animals inhale low oxygen air that leads to dangerous health problems among them because of this, animal started to disappearing from the world. Last but not least, with rising of human population, we have slowly crept into space of the animals. Since one needs space to live, massive deforestation taken place destroying the habitats of animals. As a consequences, animals are forced to relocate.
There are various methods to tackle this issues to save the rare animals. Government should creat strict laws and regulation about hunting. For instance, developed countries including Canada and USA, has rules and regulation to protect the wild life. They have strict rules how much a person can hunt the animals per season. Moreover, the essential point is educating the public about the preservation of animals to survive in their habitats. Furthermore, people need to avoid cutting the trees and limit the usage of cars and vehicles that contributed the pollution.
To sum up, I believe that many problems of animal extinction are caused by human activities. The government must take quick action to prevent the extinction of animals and build a strict rules and regulation to protect them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-12 | snowsnow2004 | 67 | view |
| 2017-08-21 | Sabee | 51 | view |
- Animal extinction due to human activities 51
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? or is the responsibility of the government of poorer countries to look after their own citizen? 70
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market 86
- In some countries boarding schools are getting more popular Is it a positive or negative development What are the reasons behind it 77
- Some countries achieve international success building specialised sports facilities for top athletes to train instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Positive or negative 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...ue to human activities. I am completely agree with this statement and we can take som...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 809, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a consequence' or simply 'consequences'?
Suggestion: a consequence; consequences
... destroying the habitats of animals. As a consequences, animals are forced to relocate. The...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rules and regulation to protect them.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7563921631 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574675324675 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9990606453 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4444444444 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231522314457 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657658850129 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730415074044 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148182234796 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806644536027 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.