the graph and table show info about water use worldwide and water consumption in 2 countries.
The charts illustrate how much of water was used for agriculture, industry and homes all over the world, and water consumption in Brazil and the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2000.
Overall, it is apparent that global water consumption was seen a significant growth over the period from 1900 to 2000, in which agriculture accounted for the highest proportion of water used. Another interesting point is that water consumption was much higher in Brazil than that in the Congo.
Looking at the detail, in 1900, around 500 km3 of water was used by the agriculture sector, while the figures for the industrial and domestic water consumption were only one-fifth of that amount. By 2000, there was a considerable climb in the water needs of the agriculture sector, reach a high of about 3000 km3. Likewise, in terms of the industrial and domestic water used, the proportions slightly rose to approximately a half and one-sixth of that amount, respectively.
In the year 2000, Brazil had 176 million population compared with just 5.2 million population of the Congo. Due to having 26.5 times more irrigated land in Brazil than in the Congo, water consumption per person in Brazil, at 359 m3, was much higher than that in the Congo, at only 8 m3.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-23 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-23 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-23 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-23 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
- the graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy, in the Uk, 2000 - 2010.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 91
- the graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy, in the Uk, 2000 - 2010.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 73
- Internet users as percentage of population. 78
- the expenditure on fast food by income groups, UK 1990. 56
- write a report describing the info belowThe flowchart below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89573459716 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7625494443 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530805687204 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7789002011 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.125 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249275799558 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128013132877 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668036831706 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173858440096 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655800358495 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.