The pie charts illustrate the proportion of internet market for retailing services in New Zealand in seperate years, 2003 and 2013 and is measured by percentages.
Overall it is immediately apparent that the major changes were in the clothes and entertainment by decreasing and soaring simultaneously.
It can be clearly seen that one of the less asperiations accounted in pastime at the beginning before going up substantially. Therefore, it stood at 21 % which consisted almost a fifth of total merchandising, but, in stark contrast to that, in 2013, the sales has climbed remarkably to 33 %, well above a third. While the percentage of clothes witnessed a marked decline over the period as a whole. Initially, fashion range was one of the most desirable feature of the people sitted on the Internet. However, this fraction commenced to go down now and then, by representing a less fifth outcome in 2013.
In comparison, with the above two aspects, the relcutants displayed the same trend by growing the whole period. Travel levelled off at above a third being the most renwoned among New Zealands at the start and remaining static at the beginning of the next decade (almost a third). Whilst reading has gone up to 3 %, staying the least important in both years.
- The bar chart below shows the highest qualification attained by sex for the working age population in Wales in 2001 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 76
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000. 84
- The bar chart below shows the highest qualification attained by sex for the working age population in Wales in 2001/2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000 79
- The bar chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, therefore, third, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01895734597 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93904431459 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668246445498 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4135147871 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.9 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118170669567 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405637389626 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743270986535 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846929798251 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100851540534 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.