The plans show a school library 5 years ago and the same library now.
The given plans demonstrate some major changes to a school library in the duration of 5 years. Overall, the school mostly renovated its library in terms of facilities while keeping the same size.
The most noticeable difference in the library was 4 studying tables in the center of the room, as 2 more were added as well as they were all divided into private sections instead of large whole tables. On either side of the studying tables, there were 2 long bookshelves. However, the one in the bottom of the map was removed to make room for student's laptops desks. In addition, other desks for laptops were added in the place of desks used for conventional computers. Also in the 5 year period, the library office has been converted into a conference room in the bottom right corner of the plan.
To the left of the studying area, some renovations could also be observed. In the lower corner, the library now has 2 separated borrowing and returning areas instead of 1 joined desk. Besides, there is now a recording room occupying the space used for a classroom, while the meeting room is still remaining.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-04 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
- The tables compare working hours of full time and part time workers in Greece Netherlands and the UK compared to European average in 2002 82
- The plans show a change to a small theater in 2010 and 2012 56
- The diagram shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 70
- The chart gives information about European people of different age groups who went to the gym once a month or more between 1990 and 2010 58
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes, and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is impo 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, still, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72164948454 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55272804045 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582474226804 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.198863618 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240623932411 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937548455866 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970943966358 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17902157664 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100694416388 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.