Create Student Committee to Decide Funding for Student Organizations
I think students should be in charge of deciding which student organizations (for example, the jazz band or the hiking club) receive money from the university. Students should also be in charge of how much money each organization receives. A special committee made up of students could be created to make these decisions. Currently, these funding decisions are made by university administrators, but a student committee would know better than the administrators which organizations are most important to students and most deserving of the university's financial support. I’m sure a lot of students would be interested in serving on the committee, and those who do serve will gain valuable leadership experience.
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-17 | dadfarfardad361 | 80.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2018-09-09 | mgrajapt | 83.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2018-08-24 | mahsa92 | 75.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2017-02-13 | mgrajapt | 70.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2019-11-10 | bishoy | 90.00 | Check this speaking |
- Explain how the examples in the lecture illustrate the concept of reactance. 70
- State whether you agree or disagree with the following statement Then explain your reasons Using specific details in your explanation Students should not be allowed to bring cell phones mobile phones into classroom 85
- Briefly summarize the problem the speakers are discussing. Then state which solution you would recommend. Explain the reasons for your recommendation. 80
- Explain how the example from the lecture illustrates the concept of procedural memory 55
- Using points and examples from the talk, describe two changes that occurred after machines began to be used for manufacturing goods. 80
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 555.0 593.389002037 94% => OK
No of words: 128.0 154.784114053 83% => More words wanted. You may: choose simpler words or speak faster or remove hesitations or remove long pauses, and fully use the time, do NOT save one or two seconds.
Chars per words: 4.3359375 3.82920900774 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.36358566101 3.52088357496 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13701509028 1.81998168104 117% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 93.7942973523 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.7578125 0.608046397892 125% => OK
Syllable count: 178.2 185.724439919 96% => OK
Avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.20224032587 116% => OK
Performance on coherence:
Topic speech coherence ratio: 0.215487498959 0.0833886788687 258% => Good job. The more, the better.
Acoustic performance on paragraphs:
How many acoustic paragraphs: 3.0 3.90020366599 77% => OK
Average paragraph length: 42.6666666667 71.3690273242 60% => OK
STD paragraph length: 31.3723161756 24.1299301424 130% => OK
Average paragraph duration: 16.1233333333 26.8388033085 60% => OK
STD paragraph duration: 11.1800308089 8.89323425527 126% => OK
Acoustic performance on sentences:
How many acoustic sentences: 30.0 40.266802444 75% => OK
Average acoustic sentence length: 4.26666666667 4.20756893501 101% => OK
STD acoustic sentence length: 3.25508149753 3.23972648638 100% => OK
Average acoustic sentences duration: 1.54633333333 1.51236819293 102% => OK
STD acoustic sentences duration: 0.964197363383 1.0352206224 93% => OK
Acoustic performance on acoustic silence:(An acoustic silence means a little pause between two or more words)
How many acoustic silence: 28.0 37.9022403259 74% => OK
Total acoustic silence duration: 5.13 7.22384928717 71% => OK
Average acoustic silence duration: 0.183214285714 0.193825474362 95% => OK
STD acoustic silence duration: 0.138333282108 0.16431695912 84% => OK
Acoustic performance on acoustic words:
Total word duration: 39.72 46.6644602851 85% => Need to talk more.
Average word duration: 0.3103125 0.304040633073 102% => OK
STD word duration: 0.162855080804 0.193491353168 84% => OK
Disfluencies: like hesitations, or 'ehn' or taking a long time to pronounce a word:
How many disfluencies: 2.0 8.88594704684 23% => Good job, the lower, the better.
Total_disfluencies_duration: 1.57 6.97134419552 23% => Good job. The lower, the better.
Total acoustic noise duration: 1.89 3.21433808554 59% => OK
Acoustic rates:
Total speech duration: 48.37 59.1375356415 82% => Talk more. Do not save time. People can talk 4-5 words in one second.
Compare to expected duration: 0.806166666667 0.985625594026 82% => Some seconds left. Need to talk more.
Rate of silence: 0.578871201158 0.643888735843 90% => OK
Rate of speech: 2.64626834815 2.61565628039 101% => OK
Rate of speech by unique words: 2.00537523258 1.58604529434 126% => OK
Rate of word duration by unique words: 2.44209466264 2.01333574461 121% => OK
Average articulation rates: 0.382841078125 0.322651457988 119% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by speech e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the speech e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas.