It is common knowledge that success is greatly in connection with food whose nutritious have been considerably high, particularly for children in schools.
Caring about the healthy meal is globally concerned but it is more important in the case of children who stay much time in the school. Firstly, everybody knows that it is hard for children to concentrate well when they are hungry. As a consequence, they have not a good performance successfully in the class. However, it is highly controversial issue around the world that how to serve a good meal. In my view, it is important to realize that what food helps brain well while students are in the classroom. Since then, government has to be able to afford a wide range of snacks which have more nutritious.
Secondly, It is certainly true that fatty and sugary foods are not healthy in a long-term period in spite of comprising more calories, including chips, crisps and cola. On the other hand, the majority of people hold the opinion that milk is useful, not only it is complete meal but also it helps their growing as well and one is strongly recommended by either school manager or parents.
Moreover, managers should handle and make an effort to distribute food as healthy as they are launched in common shops by marketers. As a result, it is highly unlikely to achieve a success in this case, otherwise parents and school stuff make a contribution together. In this case, different kinds of children whose families suffer financial problems can gain equal facilities.
In conclusion, learning effectively is closely associated with food as well as intelligence and teachers. Also, it should be noted that parents play a crucial part in training their children to stop buying things which is harmful for their bodies.
- International visitor to new zealand transport used during visit 67
- Many people believe that formal "pen and paper" examinations are not the best method of assessing education achievement. Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 95
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 95
- The chart and table below show customer satisfaction levels in the US with airlines and aspects of air travel in 1999, 2000, and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 90
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, as to, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my view, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96666666667 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75665659007 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.679983527 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.428571429 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275543630115 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078945365485 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504247988759 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136410660856 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254501113563 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.