People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Often in life we all are face situations in which we have to make decisions. Decisions that can have impact on our lives as well as lives of others. I agree to an extent with the statement that decisions based on emotions are poor ones and even justifying it later with logic is even poorer.
In business scenarios where every decisions is critical, it is imperative to assess and analyze every relevant detail before making any decision. In such cases making a decision based on emotion could have fatal consequences. Let us consider an example of government policy making. We know that the policy making is a tricky subject and making an equitable policy is a really a difficult task. Hence during the serious planning meetings where secretaries meet, the decisions are made on the basis of objectively analyzing data, considering social constraints and available resources. It is likely that seriously thought through decisions will be unanimous, coherent and easy to implement. While if decisions are only based on emotions and justified later then in the meantime the person who has to execute bears the brunt of ambiguity.
Decisions are sometimes problematic too atleast for a person or group who is making them. For example, if there is a judge who has to pass a judgement on a person who comes from a impoverished background but steals from a nobleman. Then in that case a judge can take a consideration to the poverty of the person and acquit him. But the judge never does that because in the process of making a decision he is also setting a landmark about the ideal citizen behavior, irrespective of the social status.
One can reason that in rational and objective behavior there is no place for emotion. This is also true to an extent because if human emotions are allowed to interfere then we might not have a perfect world. For example Humans like their comfort, yet everyone has to do their jobs. Consider a scenario where a factory worker asked to work long hours in night. The person might think that it is not comfortable for his interest then he must not work during that time. But the person on the other might also think that the additional income which is earned will help in sustaining the family. Hence there are consequences related to the either side but Objectively speaking decisions based on logic are durable, unlike human emotions which can change its course with a blink of an eye.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | GREprep021219 | 79 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | rajeshrawal | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | amusnakate | 33 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | Hitzee | 50 | view |
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the co 62
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 82
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...le policy is a really a difficult task. Hence during the serious planning meetings wh...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 750, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'later than'?
Suggestion: later than
...re only based on emotions and justified later then in the meantime the person who has to e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 756, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...y based on emotions and justified later then in the meantime the person who has to e...
^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... a judgement on a person who comes from a impoverished background but steals from...
^
Line 7, column 592, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ned will help in sustaining the family. Hence there are consequences related to the e...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, really, so, then, well, while, as to, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8014354067 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62095397499 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519138755981 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8831029061 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5714285714 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9047619048 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95238095238 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303398191147 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828691225587 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808914463054 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189438904407 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679257760608 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.