should we wear natural fur to protect the environment from synthetics?
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-10-11 | EugeneDubinchuk | 10.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2017-10-30 | EugeneDubinchuk | 70.00 | Check this speaking |
- TPO 40 - Question 5 70
- 1138 WM second 10 1119 second what was the last meal you cooked? 70
- 1747 tell me about an interesting news item you've read or heard recently? 80
- 1806 what experience do you have of traveling to other countries? 80
- 1796 what effects has modern technology had on the way food is produced? 80
Comments
Dear Sir,
Dear Sir,
The comparison of wearing fur with weaning synthetics seems to be weird, it is like comparing using a ledge with dogs and vehicles powered by fuel.
May you give me more examples of how to answer this question and more importantly what this issue means. How should I analyze it?
It is related to the
It is related to the understanding of the topic.
Synthetic means chemically produced.
for example, synthetic fabrics are made by joining monomers into polymers, through a process called polymerization. A synthetic fabric, when magnified, looks like plastic spun together. Chemicals used to make synthetic fabric include sodium hydroxide and carbon disulfide, which are derived from coal, oil, or natural gas.
Since Synthetic is not friendly to the environment, so the topic asked us wearing natural furs instead, but wearing natural furs could not be friendly to animals either, so we need to compare. don't make a quick decision.
5.5 out of 9
not exactly right on the topic. we need to compare the damages made by wearing natural fur, and damages from synthetics.