should we wear natural fur to protect the environment from synthetics?
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-10-30 | EugeneDubinchuk | 70.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2017-10-11 | EugeneDubinchuk | 10.00 | Check this speaking |
- 1681 do you think that the possibility of working from home via the internet will lead to many people going back to the countryside?
- 787 describe a place you have recently visitedyou should saywhere you wentwho you went withhow you got thereand explain why you enjoyed it 80
- 1658 first Describe a photo you likeYou Should SayWhere the photo was takenWho took the photoWhat can be seen from the photoAnd explain why you like this photo 70
- 09 1073 how can games sometimes help to unite people? 70
- 1671 what kinds of transport do you use regularly? 70
Comments
Dear Sir,
Dear Sir,
The comparison of wearing fur with weaning synthetics seems to be weird, it is like comparing using a ledge with dogs and vehicles powered by fuel.
May you give me more examples of how to answer this question and more importantly what this issue means. How should I analyze it?
It is related to the
It is related to the understanding of the topic.
Synthetic means chemically produced.
for example, synthetic fabrics are made by joining monomers into polymers, through a process called polymerization. A synthetic fabric, when magnified, looks like plastic spun together. Chemicals used to make synthetic fabric include sodium hydroxide and carbon disulfide, which are derived from coal, oil, or natural gas.
Since Synthetic is not friendly to the environment, so the topic asked us wearing natural furs instead, but wearing natural furs could not be friendly to animals either, so we need to compare. don't make a quick decision.
5.5 out of 9
not exactly right on the topic. we need to compare the damages made by wearing natural fur, and damages from synthetics.