Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is important to read or watch news presented by people with different views than people by similar views.
By and large, it is of little debate in today's world that news is of great importance. This is inasmuch as people watch the news every day to know the things going on around the globe. With this in mind, it is quite expected to notice some of its aspects are somewhat controversial due to its prominent standing; many people wonder whether to watch news presented by people with different views or people by similar ones. I personally agree with the former and I will vindicate my standpoint as follows:
As a matter of fact, it is important to make sure of the news accuracy. The news that people with different views present are more diversified. Thus, it is possible to derive the more accurate ones through rational thinking within different and sometimes perplexing pile of news. For instance, let's take a person and assume that he lives in USA. Having lived in USA, he watches different news about Iran. But there is a different point of view that is narrating by Medias inside Iran. Due the conflicts between two countries both of the views are biased and rarely are precise. Therefore if he just watches one side of the news, he won't be sure whether the news is accurate.
In addition, watching news presented by different views can help one understand the socio-political elements that are affecting the narration of either side. It is obvious that the variables within a country or region, like the economic condition, religious belief of the people and political view of the government etc., can affect the accuracy of news. Considering the aforementioned variables it is crucial to understand them to help to understand and derive the accurate news.
In conclusion, having analyzed the reasons above, one can safely conclude that watching news with different point of views is a better option. This is due to the reasons given, which are the higher accuracy and better understanding of different countries with different conditions. Thus, let's hope that with cooperation of governments, freedom of information circulation will be guaranteed so people have access to more accurate and comprehensive news of the world.
- Do you aGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT?Internet should be like other services such as roads and government should provide it to the public with no cost. 80
- TPO 29- integrated 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to read or watch news presented by people with different views than people by similar views. 90
- TPO 23-integrated 73
- TPO 23- Integrated 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 579, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...iews are biased and rarely are precise. Therefore if he just watches one side of the news...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'reasons'' or 'reason's'?
Suggestion: reasons'; reason's
... is a better option. This is due to the reasons given, which are the higher accuracy an...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97198879552 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7881717518 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498599439776 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8043902955 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.411764706 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378328511935 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12855678574 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107881168589 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24419431496 0.150856017488 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786430578725 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.