tpo-41
In the reading, the author presents 3 arguments against the establishing new strict regulations for handling and storing coal ash which is a harmful material left after burning coal. However, finding all the arguments questionable and implausible, the lecturer totally disputes them and expresses that new strict rules are definitely required.
At first, the author argues that effective environmental regulations already exist. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that these existed regulations, such as using liner to prevent leaking coal ash components into the soil and water, are not sufficient. Based on these regulations companies are forced to use the liner only in new landfills and ponds and there is no rule asked companies use the liner for old landfills. Owing to the fact that old landfills can significantly harm the environment by contaminating groundwater with coal ash leaked into the sail, new regulations should force companies to use the liner in those ponds and landfills.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that new stricter rules on handling coal ash may lead to a reduction in buying the products in which coal ash is employed. That being said, the lecturer dismisses it by clarifying the fact that imposing new strict regulations does not bring about stop buying the products. The lecturer provides an example.Since many years ago, other dangerous material, mercury, has been subject to strict and intense rules but there is no declining in its use and customers are now using it.
Finally, the author draws attention to increase the cost of storing coal ash and the corresponding rise in the price of electricity as the support of the claim. Yet again, the lecturer dismisses it by pointing out that the result of imposing new regulations outweighs its cost. Imposing the new rules makes the cost of power plant increased by 15 billion dollars and 1 percent in the price of electricity for each user. It is worth by considering the fact that we can finally have a clean environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Since
...ducts. The lecturer provides an example.Since many years ago, other dangerous materia...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, may, so, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 334.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09281437126 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84380234966 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532934131737 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6286400281 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.846153846 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517666045346 0.272083759551 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174720061287 0.0996497079465 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111074103274 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30409610787 0.162205337803 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465610893891 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.