Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for this country. What are the reason? Solutions to change negative attitudes.
Today, travel destination all over the world welcome a growing influx of foreign visitors every year. However, many people living in these place believe that internation travel has some negative effects on the host country. This essay will examine the reasons behinds this thinking before suggesting some possible measures to change this attitude.
There are two significant reasons why many people think that international tourism is a bad thing. Firstly, foreign travelers is often associated with an increase in the level of environment pollution. Many tourists often pollute and litter beautiful spots and several famous beaches, which contributes to air, water and soil contamination. For example, many beaches in Vietnam became full of garbage after the foreign tourists leave. Secondly, foreigners usually do not understand and respect the traditions and customs of the host country so it may have an adverse impact on traditional customs and indigenous practices because tourist may be insensitive towards the feelingsof local residents. For example, many foreigners wear short skirts when visiting pagodas and temples in Vietnam, which is unacceptable so that it might make a bad image of the foreigners to the locals.
On the other hand, these problems are not without solutions to change the negative attitudes of the local people about international tourism . The first solution is that bodies such as the World Tourism Organisation must enforce strict regulations on the toursim industry. For example, the government should prohibit tourists littering indisctiminately or collecting rubbish after they leave. In addition, tourists agencies should urge visitors to respect the local customs and culture of their hosts. For example, international tourists must be provided information about traditions and customs of their destination to help them understand and have right behavious.
In conclusion, negative feelings about global tourism still are common in society. Nevertheless, this can be resolves by talking the above suggestions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-11-13 | trangh16688 | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing. What factors contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 84
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 84
- The important of biodiversity is being widely recognised as increasing bumbers of species come under threat.What can be done to maintain biodiversity. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...local people about international tourism . The first solution is that bodies such ...
^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e. In addition, tourists agencies should urge visitors to respect the local custo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65909090909 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89218287408 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603896103896 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6058694989 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9375 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313336388127 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964868558413 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104519758112 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167403748675 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513751224835 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.