TPO 34
The reading specifies that there are three theories about the main cause of the extinction of the sea cow. However, the professor explains that we cannot find out what make sea cows extinct and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First of all, the author states that sea cows were a good source of food and native siberian people hunted sea cows for many years and after a while they become extinct. The professor opposes this point by saying that the sea cows were massive creature and weight ten ton and capturing couple of them could feed many people for a month. Also the population of native siberian were few and it was not vital for them to capture large number of sea cows.
Second, based on the reading, there was ecosystems disturbances which declined the main source of food of sea cows and these change help its extinction. The lecturer assert that if sever ecosystems disturbances happen and decline the main food of sea cow, it also change the population of other marine animal and not just kelp and native people do not record any food shortage and it is not feasible that because of the ecological changes sea cows extinct.
Third, according to the reading, when European fur traders come to the island, they had many weapons that allow them to capture and kill sea cows and because of this sea cows extinct. The speaker contradicts the idea reasoning that the population of sea cows decreases before European fur traders come to the island. Hence, it was another main reason that trigger the reduce of sea cows population and European fur traders did not have a role diminish of sea cows population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-15 | ormon200678 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | rassata | 70 | view |
| 2022-06-29 | ellen87713 | view | |
| 2022-01-30 | omega93 | 80 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | vida00 | 80 | view |
- TPO 34 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 71
- In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 337, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...hem could feed many people for a month. Also the population of native siberian were ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'asserts'.
Suggestion: asserts
...hange help its extinction. The lecturer assert that if sever ecosystems disturbances h...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'changes'?
Suggestion: changes
...cline the main food of sea cow, it also change the population of other marine animal a...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 364, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...it was another main reason that trigger the reduce of sea cows population and European fur...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, second, so, third, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71228070175 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29326096645 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505263157895 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.844678067 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.3 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 21.698381199 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.638591130102 0.272083759551 235% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.300257352207 0.0996497079465 301% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911443869343 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.396361883646 0.162205337803 244% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627755321943 0.0443174109184 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.