The reading passage shows doubt about the accuracy of the memoir wrote by Chevalier. It claims that Chevalier wrote self made story in the memoir to make his life more interesting. However, the professor from the lecture says the memoir is pretty accurate as some research works have done.
First, the article questioned that if Chevalier had been very rich, why he needed to borrow hansome amount of money from a merchant. The professor refutes the point by saying that borrowing money does not mean Chevailer was poor. The memoir shows that he spent a lot of money on parties and gambling he needed to sell some assets to get money back. As the process is a lengthy one, in the mean time he borrowed some money from the merchant.
Secondly, the reading passage claims that it is impossible to write the exact conversation made by Chevailer and Voltaier after many years later. However, the professor says that witness from that time period confirmed that Chevailer wrote those conversation every night for several years. For that reason the conversation was so accurate.
Thirdly, the reading refutes that Chevailer did not break from Venice jail, rather he might have bribed the jailers through his political connections to get out. The professor opposes the point by saying that other prisoners with Chevailer had more powerfull political connections but they could not get out of the jail. That explains it was really hard to bribe the jailers to get out of the jail. The professor also added that, later it was discovered that the ceiling was repaired of the room in which Chevailer stayed. Therefore it explains that if Chevailer did not excaped from a hole in the ceiling it did not needed to be repaired.
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- Integrated task- Altruism 3
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves. Examples of altruis 73
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 73
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Which of these situations do you think is better? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this conversation' or 'those conversations'?
Suggestion: this conversation; those conversations
...e period confirmed that Chevailer wrote those conversation every night for several years. For that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 524, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... of the room in which Chevailer stayed. Therefore it explains that if Chevailer did not e...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 618, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'need'
Suggestion: need
...d from a hole in the ceiling it did not needed to be repaired.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88054607509 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44213633247 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498293515358 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6626084271 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363456383825 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120843275791 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635244526632 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212990259993 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733056083822 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.