Nowadays, there are many debates about how should students chose their careers. The statement proposes that Educational institutions should give direction for lucrative careers. I do not agree with this statement for the following reasons.
I suppose that we live in fast changing world, and brilliant career yesterday not so actually brilliant today. For example, the accountant was a good and lucrative job in our country ten years ago. Plethora people dreamed about this profession and went to study accounting. But after ten years we have a lot of people without good income in accounting just because the situation in our country has changed dramatically. A large part accounting function were replaced by machine and special soft, instead of paper. Moreover the interaction between organizations and government more automatically when ever before. To sum up just one worker needs in place where were ten people before, and nine people have to change their careers now.
However in the nineties career of engineer was not attractive at all, but now, after twenty years people who has chosen this carrier have a good income.
Furthermore, I believe that only people who really love their job, can be successful and can be useful for society and economic.
In conclusion, it is very important to have good income from gob an have lucrative carreer, but educational institutions should prepare people for different career.
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 62
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supp 75
- In some countries people are now buying fewer new things and buying more second hand things instead In your opinion what are some possible reasons for this Is this a positive or negative trend 92
- In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge. 50
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 515, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ine and special soft, instead of paper. Moreover the interaction between organizations a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ople have to change their careers now. However in the nineties career of engineer was ...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 66, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... important to have good income from gob an have lucrative carreer, but educational...
^^
Line 8, column 66, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... important to have good income from gob an have lucrative carreer, but educational inst...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, so, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 58.6224719101 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 2235.4752809 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 229.0 442.535393258 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26637554585 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.55969084622 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75281016544 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637554585153 0.4932671777 129% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 704.065955056 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4539617617 60.3974514979 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.7692307692 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6153846154 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 5.21951772744 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134826234664 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557762951783 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655953833921 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890130911314 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891434932167 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 100.480337079 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.