The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. Summarise
the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares the clients' spending on three varieties of items in 5 European nations in 2002.
Overall, it can be seen that while the most favourite products were Food/Drinks/Tobacco among all nations, Leisure/Education was the least popular item for given 5 countries.
In terms of Food/Drinks/Tobacco, Turkey topped the list on expenditure with around a third (32.14%) of the total, followed by Ireland at 28.91%, slightly lower than the former. In contrast, the spending for the rest was below one-fifth (20%) like Italy (16.36%), Spain (18.80%) and Sweden (15.77%) respectively. Despite being in the 4th place for Food/Drinks/Tobacco, Italy ranked first regarding the Clothing/Footwear with 9%, whereas the expenditure ranged between 5% to 7% for the remaining.
When it comes to Leisure/Education, the spending was far lower than the discussed two items. Turkey again was the number one country in the spending at 4.35%, which was twice as many as Ireland at 2.21%. Interestingly, the figure between Italy and Sweden was almost identical (3.20% vs 3.22%), a negligible difference. And Spain was the one who spent slightest with 1.98%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | drstonedescendants | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | Lytran | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-07 | Võ Ngân | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-20 | Iryanti Wulandari | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-30 | Hyacinthos | 11 | view |
- The pie chart show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 81
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 71
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 66
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Writing task 2 (an essay)Many people make friends through social sites and chat rooms. Others believe that it is not a good idea to make friends without meeting them face to face. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and rel 90
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 189 200
No. of Characters: 905 1000
No. of Different Words: 121 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.708 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.788 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.423 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 61 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 46 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 29 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 17 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.782 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.444 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.387 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.653 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.038 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, third, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34444444444 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48975573095 2.65546596893 131% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661111111111 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4276105222 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.888888889 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0645305042271 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0321023292687 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442283696875 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0561651420525 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520936061005 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.