integrated essay TPO 19
The reading cast doubt on Buzzing reliability and posites three reasons to support this idea. However, the lecture compeletly reject the claims provided by reading and brings up three counter points to strenthen his ideology.
To start out with, the author content that because the buzzer are paided to make a admiration about the company products, people do not trust them as they think they give wrong information to falsely convince them. On the opposite site, in the lecture, buzzre refute this idea by declaring that although bzzers are paid, they are hired by company to tell the true. Hence, it is baseless claim made by the passage.
Additionally, based on the article, people don not pay enough attention to buzzers as they should do, they may buy the product but after that they will be doubtfull about their purches. Conversely, the speaker confirms exactly the opposite of prepared claim by the author due to the fact that peopel ask lot of question to be sure about the product. Thus, if they are not assured and do not find it appropriate product they never by it. Therefore, provided evidence is far-fetced.
Finally, as the reading passage push forth the idea that buzzer may lose their trustfullnees and reliability among social group who know them. Because, the people do know they are buzzers working for hidden agenda. But, the speaking buzzer dissmiss this benet and thing it is foolish by saying that the company employ them based on the reliance which buzzer provide for them and if they are unfaitfull, the company would never hire them since they were phone servicers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading cast doubt on Buzzing relia...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t because the buzzer are paided to make a admiration about the company products, ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, hence, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01851851852 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39589555296 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585185185185 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.312002987 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.916666667 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362736739605 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125221443446 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969504281883 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198411873988 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967546777208 0.0443174109184 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.