"The illiterates of the 21st century are not those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn"- Alvin Toffler. Explain the statement and do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, the question “whether those who cannot learn or the people who cannot read and write are illiterate or not?” has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world. It is a widely held view that learning new methods and technologies is highly beneficial. I tend to believe that one must carefully weigh up the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common view that learning plays a vital role in the world of science. First and foremost is that since we have been living in a developing world it is crucial to learn and get familiar with the function of modern devices and technologies, such as computer and the Internet. Secondly, it can be argued that without learning the latest achievements it is hard to find an appropriate job. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that the scientists by reviewing and learning previous methods will be able to promote their knowledge. A group of scientists, working at prestigious university conducted that the recent prosperities in terms of medicine, education, and technology have been made by continual efforts and learnings.
However, there is no doubt that the importance of learning rather than reading and writing provides various negative points. It should be taken into account that learning new subjects is an integral part of the capability of reading and writing. Moreover, without having the ability of reading and writing achievement to methods of learning is impossible.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree with learning as a prominent factor of literacy. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce restrict legislation, and the individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
- The use of newspaper will be less important in future Do you agree or disagree with this statement Explain with reasons and examples 84
- Do you agree with getting married before finishing studies? 85
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which subject will you choose? 88
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 11
- Do you think English will remain a global language despite globalization? Discuss your views with examples. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...are illiterate or not?' has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, in addition, no doubt, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17832167832 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96731217804 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594405594406 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2333778495 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.923076923 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213825181454 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657159711952 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108359208099 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128517006435 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116704408106 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.