The author of the argument claims that Grove collage sholuld only allow females candidates to sign up for their programs.
To support this view the author states that it maintains Grove Collage tradition of all-female education. The author also points out that keeping the college all-female will improve morale among students and convince alumnae to keep supporting the college financially. However the line of reasoning presented by the author is full of incomplete evidence and unsubstantiated assumption, which renders the argument weak and unconvincing.
First of all, the author of the argument states that Grove students, both past and present, are against the idea of coeducation. The author fails to consider the possibility that these student both past and present want coeducation but due to the influence and force made by senior students and teachers made them vote against their will. Unless we are not sure about that they vote against their will or not .We cannot say Grove students, both past and present, are against the idea of coeducation.
Moreover, the author of the argument states that Eighty percent of the students responding to a survey conducted by the student government wanted the school to remain all female, and over half of the alumnae who answered a separate survey also opposed coeducation.The author fails to consider the possibility that this data may be altered and represent only minority which results in false outcomes of survey . Unless we cannot know whether data is true or not , we cannot say that eighty percent of student and half of alumnae against coeducation.
The author of the argument states that keeping the college all-female will improve morale among students and convince alumnae to keep supporting the college financially.The author fails to consider the possibility that their are others sources from where collage can get the funds like from government and companies. Unless we are not sure whether funds are only provided by alumnae and we cannot say that the college all-female will improve morale among students and convince alumnae to keep supporting the college financially.
To conclude , the author in current syates lack subastantial ground to make a persuave case. Therefore the author need to provide more credivle evidence to strengther his or hre calims
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- 157. The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, to the college's governing committee.Recently, there have been discussions about ending Grove College's century-old tradition of 43
- The following memo appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council."An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby East M 43
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current 59
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: The author of the argument claims that Grove collage sholuld only allow females candidates to sign up for their programs.
Error: sholuld Suggestion: should
Sentence: To conclude , the author in current syates lack subastantial ground to make a persuave case.
Error: subastantial Suggestion: substantial
Error: persuave Suggestion: persuade
Error: syates Suggestion: states
Sentence: Therefore the author need to provide more credivle evidence to strengther his or hre calims
Error: calims Suggestion: claims
Error: hre Suggestion: her
Error: credivle Suggestion: credible
Error: strengther Suggestion: No alternate word
--------------------
argument 1 -- not OK
argument 2 -- not OK
argument 3 -- OK
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 8 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 374 350
No. of Characters: 1921 1500
No. of Different Words: 156 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.398 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.136 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.567 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 157 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 115 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.769 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.332 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.462 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.435 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.708 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.218 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...eep supporting the college financially. However the line of reasoning presented by the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this student' or 'these students'?
Suggestion: this student; these students
... fails to consider the possibility that these student both past and present want coeducation ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 409, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...that they vote against their will or not .We cannot say Grove students, both past ...
^^
Line 4, column 411, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: We
...at they vote against their will or not .We cannot say Grove students, both past an...
^^
Line 6, column 265, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...eparate survey also opposed coeducation.The author fails to consider the possibilit...
^^^
Line 6, column 409, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...hich results in false outcomes of survey . Unless we cannot know whether data is t...
^^
Line 6, column 461, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... cannot know whether data is true or not , we cannot say that eighty percent of st...
^^
Line 8, column 170, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...keep supporting the college financially.The author fails to consider the possibilit...
^^^
Line 8, column 220, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... fails to consider the possibility that their are others sources from where collage c...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the college financially. To conclude , the author in current syates lack subas...
^^
Line 10, column 94, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...tantial ground to make a persuave case. Therefore the author need to provide more credivl...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 11.1786427146 170% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 55.5748502994 97% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 2260.96107784 88% => OK
No of words: 372.0 441.139720559 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32795698925 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71566190008 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 204.123752495 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432795698925 0.468620217663 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 705.55239521 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.8473053892 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.1684795849 57.8364921388 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.461538462 119.503703932 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6153846154 23.324526521 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 5.70786347227 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.25449101796 209% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0850356126524 0.218282227539 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381528602331 0.0743258471296 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308522603781 0.0701772020484 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0470819565348 0.128457276422 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032532604127 0.0628817314937 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.3799401198 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.3550499002 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.197005988 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 12.5979740519 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.1389221557 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.