The bar chart displays the British people selected 5 destinations for immigration in the period between 2004 to 2007. Overall it is clear that British people have immigrated to Australia, Spain, New Zealand, USA and France.
To Specify, In 2004 and 2005, almost 40 thousands of British people preferred Australian immigration, next in 2006 it has shown a sudden raise in immigration to Australia over 50 thousands, where as in 2007 again the number has reduced to 45 thousands.
Furthermore, the second popular destination was Spain where almost 35 percent of Britishers preferred to immigrate over the period of three years, while comparing Australia with other countries Australia was most Favourite destination for Britishers to immigrate and the third most favourite destination was France in 2004 and 2007 only 20 percent Britishers immigrated to Australia. Whereas New Zealand only had a average immigrants about 22 percent each year. Therefore, Australia was the most popular destination among other four countries in terms of immigration.
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999, and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 64
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 92
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A,B and C over four different seasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 90
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Zealand, USA and France. To Specify, In 2004 and 2005, almost 40 thousands of...
^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '40 thousand'.
Suggestion: 40 thousand
... To Specify, In 2004 and 2005, almost 40 thousands of British people preferred Australian imm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...gration to Australia over 50 thousands, where as in 2007 again the number has reduced to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ent Britishers immigrated to Australia. Whereas New Zealand only had a average immigran...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...Australia. Whereas New Zealand only had a average immigrants about 22 percent eac...
^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'immigrant'?
Suggestion: immigrant
... Whereas New Zealand only had a average immigrants about 22 percent each year. Therefore, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, therefore, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49693251534 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97789414075 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 109.620050883 43.030603864 255% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 149.333333333 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195275403325 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113992672647 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133321848221 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152654107401 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777869863463 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.