TPO20 Integrated writing
Both the reading and the lecture discuss whether the natural forest fire caused such the damage in Yellowstone. However, the professor strongly disagrees with the reading passage.
First of all, the reading passage mentions that Yellowstone fires caused tremendous damage to the trees and other vegetation. Yet, the lecturer severely challenges the theory by arguing that the fire also gave an opportunity for plants to be more diverse. Furthermore, she states that the large trees would be replaced by the smaller trees after the fires. Also, some seeds would be stimulated to grow due to the high level of heat. Hence, the first theory is not convincing.
Secondly, the passage mentions that the fires also affected wildlife in the park. Still, the lecturer strongly disagrees with this theory by arguing that the fire also create chances for animals to survive. Moreover, she states that smaller plants could be the ideal habitat for the smaller animals. Besides, she said that once the population of the smaller animals increased, the predators would also increase. As a result, the food train would be stronger.
Last but not least, the article mentions that the fires compromised the value of the park as a tourist attraction. Actually, the lecturer mentions that the fires occur every year. Also, the rainfall will help the land in the park to recover. Thus, the tourists can come back to the park in next year. That is to say, the value of the park as a tourist attraction will not be affected by the fires.
In conclusion, the professor argues against each theory in the reading. That is to say, she maintains that the natural forest fire in Yellowstone was not only the damage but also part of the normal ecosystem circle.
- school used to offer three after-class activities.1)sports 2)art 3)volunteeringļ¼but this year, school's extra money may only can offer one activity. Which one do you choose and why? 73
- TPO21 Integrated writing 80
- TPO 22 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Sometimes people think nowadays the media TV newspaper Internet are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public 87
- T P O 53 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, thus, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98287671233 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46703495997 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472602739726 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2772590031 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.5789473684 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3684210526 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300497485489 0.272083759551 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934874982197 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573826257108 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165418949227 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302396896755 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.