It has been argued that companies and private individual, not the government should pay the bill to clean up environmental pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Undoubtedly, having a clean biophysical surrounding is an important factor for our sustainable survival. Environmental pollution is one of the most unwanted problems the world is facing today. Though there is a heated debate whether government or private companies and individual ought to pay the bill for cleaning up the pollution, my view is that all of them might need to work together to overcome this problem.
There are several reasons why all of these parties should have a share of the cost of cleaning up the pollution. Corporations make profit from the processes that cause the pollution, government make money by taxing the profit made by the polluting companies. Public make its share in this whole process by using goods made by polluting process. Therefore, this is a vicious cycle where everyone is contributing to create pollution either directly or indirectly.For example, knowing the fact that plastic bags are not ecofriendly government is permitting companies to produce them and public all around the world are using them in everyday life.
A second reason why they are not solely responsible for the total cost of cleaning up is that companies dump toxic products mostly in the river system. If companies had to dispose them properly, they will have to compromise with their profits. Then companies left with the choice of laying off people which will increase the unemployment rate and have a negative impact on global economy. Likewise public prefer car over public transport because it is more convenient and time saving though emission from vehicles is one of the most important factors for causing pollution. Furthermore, it is the responsibility of a government to ensure a healthy social structure for all its citizen. If tax revenue is not sufficient for disposing of waste material, government can perform this responsibility by availing loan. For example, International Monetary Fund lend huge amount of money to government at a very minimum interest rate for such purposes.
Righting our wrong is the perfect solution for pollution. Since world is experiencing the highest possible level of pollution, I think, this situation calls for concerted effort of government, public and private corporations to solve or at least mitigate the whole gamut resulting from this environmental pollution.
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- Some people think that women can play an equal role to men in country s police force and army While others think this kind of work is not suitable for women Discuss both view and give your opinion 48
- There are many things that motivate a person to work but money is the most compelling In your opinion how influential is the power of money 76
- Fossil fuels are the main sources of energy in many countries. But alternative source are being encouraged. Is this a positive or negative trend? 93
- The graph below shows the changes in maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
Sentence: Corporations make profit from the processes that cause the pollution, government make money by taxing the profit made by the polluting companies.
Description: The fragment that cause the is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace cause with verb, past tense
Description: The fragment government make money is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace make with verb, present tense, 3rd person singular
Sentence: Public make its share in this whole process by using goods made by polluting process.
Description: An adjective is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to Public and make
Sentence: Likewise public prefer car over public transport because it is more convenient and time saving though emission from vehicles is one of the most important factors for causing pollution.
Description: An adjective is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to public and prefer
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
It is on top list:
http://www.testbig.com/essay-categories/ielts
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 372 350
No. of Characters: 1921 1500
No. of Different Words: 211 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.392 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.164 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.84 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 147 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 112 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 84 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 57 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.14 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.562 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.31 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.502 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.104 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5