The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, *20.., and future projections for 2025. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts compare the changes in the southland’s main exports in three products namely international tourism, dairy products and meat products in southland’s across three years in 2000, 2017 and 2025. Although international tourism constituted the highest exports in southland in 2000, otherwise dairy product makeup first exports in 2017, it is also noticeable that the meat products exports fell from 2000 to 2017, while dairy products exports rose. However, international tourism expected to be first main export in 2025 and two other major products decrease in 2025.

In southlands main exports in 2000 comprised international tourism taking first stage with amount of 8 billion pounds and dairy products achieving second place with near 7 billion pounds, in the other hands, southland’s main exports in 2017 account for dairy products with amount of near 10 billion pounds and international tourism is near 9 billion pounds.

Figure expected for 2025 consists of international tourism with amount of 10 billion pounds and fell in Agriculture products includes dairy and meat with declining dairy product in more than 9 billion pounds and meat product to 5 billion pounds.

Overall, it seems southland’s want to developing their exports in international tourism instead dairy and meat products in 2015 in that their experiences in 2000 and 2017.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50943396226 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04256618189 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424528301887 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.0732975165 43.030603864 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 194.666666667 112.824112599 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.3333333333 22.9334400587 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156914635072 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111108029406 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048935690229 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105639261676 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559242824098 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.2 13.2329268293 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.27 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.