The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007.
The line graph compares the quantity of foreign travelers visiting three natural destinations in a European nation from 1987 to 2007.
It is clear that those places attracted more visitors over that period, with the most significant change belonging to the figure for the lakes. Coastal areas were usually the favorite destination.
In 1987, 40 thousand foreigners paid visits to places near the sea, doubling the number of international holidaymakers to mountainous ones. Similarly, the later was twofold higher than the quantity of visits to the lakes, at 10 thousand.
From that time onwards, all the places welcomed more people from other countries. To specify, after a marginal initial fall of only about 5 thousand in the first five years, the number of overseas tourists to coastal areas climbed moderately to a peak of around 75 thousand in 2007. Likewise, the mountains, despite many erratic periods, experienced a 15 thousand rise over the period shown. The number of visitors to the lakes had rocketed to peak at 75 thousand in 2002 before decreasing by roughly 25 thousand for the last five years.
- Topic The graph below shows the number of inquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 81
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- People think that children nowadays have more freedom. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, likewise, similarly, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 1615.20841683 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 182.0 315.596192385 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14835164835 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7152031639 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 176.041082164 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637362637363 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 506.74238477 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6420690637 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167264040778 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626305008601 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650426613555 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10381730316 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634602156736 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.