The bar chart below shiws the global sales of television by supervision incorporataion from 1999- 2012.
The given bar chart describes, the world television market observation incorparation between 1999-2012 the information illustrated in million units.
According to the graph, lots of television sild year in 2012 and the few television marketed in 1999 year. On the other hand , year by year was shiwn fluctuated. While between 1999-2000 year were represented rougly same and earn approximately same currency. It was under ten amd over ten . As a general trend, from 2005-2008 years were throught period presented slightly climbed. While after years shown conversely gone up and down. Wheares, between 2001-2002 years were indicated obviously remained stable and it was over ten. Overall, although the highest sold year was in 2012 and it just under 50. The lowest television sold year in 1999. It was under ten. Most popular years were between 2010 and 2013. Started in 1999 year and significantly climbed , rapidly up and sharply down after years. On the one side some periods depict earn same money.
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.Do yoy agree or disagree? 56
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with nationally. 56
- the graph shows the percentage of U.K. Adolescent following a vegetarian diet. 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spared from 1981- 2007 73
- Sime people say that leisure time is important for having a good life while other belive that money is important Do you agree or disagree 48
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...999-2012 the information illustrated in million units. According to the graph, lots...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun television seems to be countable; consider using: 'few televisions'.
Suggestion: few televisions
...of television sild year in 2012 and the few television marketed in 1999 year. On the other han...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...marketed in 1999 year. On the other hand , year by year was shiwn fluctuated. Whil...
^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... currency. It was under ten amd over ten . As a general trend, from 2005-2008 year...
^^
Line 3, column 755, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d in 1999 year and significantly climbed , rapidly up and sharply down after years...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21739130435 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68059765859 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639751552795 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8266891368 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 60.0 112.824112599 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.5 22.9334400587 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132976824407 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518393796954 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722551710326 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155439592787 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674486441121 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.81 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.