Do you think consumers should avoid over packed products or is it the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant examples with your own experience
Today, over packaged products are flooding the markets. Since over packaging cost the consumers as well as the environment, there is an urgent need to curtail its usage. It is believed that it is a producer’s responsibility to shun such packaging techniques. This will be shown by analyzing cost savings and curtailing environmental damage.
To begin with, over packaging often shoots up product’s price significantly. This means less packaging will pull the price downwards. For example, McDonald packs their burgers in a paper wrap then put it in a cardboard container and then hand it over to customers in a paper bag. Instead, if they only put it in a box, it will reduce the price of the burger. When looking at this example it is obvious that responsible steps by producers to cut down on excess packaging expense is not only plausible but also mutually beneficial.
In addition, over packaging is a major catalyst of environmental damage as it augments co2 emission. So It is producers responsibility to minimize harm to the ecosystem. For instance, box packaging cost trees which not only costs buyers and sellers but the whole planet. So it is the best interest of everyone to make minimal use packaging. This clearly shows that manufacturers should avoid over-packaging of goods.
This analysis establishes that cost saving and curtailing environmental damage is mutually profitable. In a nutshell, it is producer’s responsibility to avoid excess packaging by taking necessary steps. It is recommended that they must willingly make necessary changes for the betterment of the everyone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-27 | Tamanna_87 | 77 | view |
- “In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples 77
- With all the problems in the world today, some people think that spending money on space exploration is a complete waste. The money can be better spent on other causes. What is your opinion? 88
- Many companies involve employees in decision-making policy; some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What are the advantages or disadvantages associated with this? 77
- In most education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think this is a good idea? Give your reasons. 70
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packed products or is it the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant examples with your own experience 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'everyone'?
Suggestion: the; everyone
...necessary changes for the betterment of the everyone.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27906976744 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25531557647 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56976744186 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9442848642 50.4703680194 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.1176470588 104.977214359 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1764705882 20.9669160288 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208029490243 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716212671177 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659913014292 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126663043447 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233753407916 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 12.6369458128 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.1260098522 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.