Nowadays, the differences between rich and poor begin to increase more than in the past. These problems start to be more interested in several countries and find the solutions for these problems. This essay will discuss both problems and solutions carefully.
First of all, there is the difference of education between poor and rich peoples. Rich peoples have opportunities to study in better school or university than poor peoples. The most of schools which have high tuition fee usually have the effective teachers. As a result, poor peoples do not have chances to study in those schools. Therefore, the government should produce more effective teachers and spread these teachers to all of school.
Secondly, law has no strict with rich peoples. Rich people usually get less legal penalties when they do illegal while poor people get full of penalties. For example, in my country, rich person kill endangered species for some reasons in the conserved forest and there are a clear evidences in the situation but nothing happen with them. Hence, the government and polices should be honest and strict with the law of country.
Lastly, rich peoples do everything in their business since produced until exported. In several countries, they have a law to protect rich peoples do this but it has no these laws in my country. Poor people can not compete with rich people because they do not have enough budget to compete in the market. Thus, the government should look after, control business and make a law to protect business model like this.
To sum up, the most gap between poor and rich happen from the weakness of government and the law in the country. Personally, I think that everybody should look after and take an action with the wrong things in society.
- The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 73
- The diagram below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people say watching TV is bad for children in all ways others say it is good for children to get knowledge Discuss both views and give your opinion 52
- The graphs below show the percentage of household energy used and the amount of greenhouse gases produced in Australia. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the schools') or simply say ''most schools''.
Suggestion: most of the schools; most schools
...ol or university than poor peoples. The most of schools which have high tuition fee usually hav...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...protect rich peoples do this but it has no these laws in my country. Poor people c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, lastly, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, i think, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96632996633 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46300841594 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521885521886 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.584662047 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.9444444444 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174603017736 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620341786906 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447179728572 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104282120896 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026454272051 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.