Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats, or other animals like members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans

In today's societies, the question of whether it is a good idea that people treat their pets as members of the family and make a close relationship with them has become a controversial issue among people in many circles and camps. Different people have various type of responses to this topic based on their social, cultural, or even familial backgrounds. However, as far as I'm concerned, I believe that having a close connection with pets is a good action for some reasons that I elaborate them in the following paragraphs.

To begin with, the first thing comes to mind right off the bat is that when parents behave too kindly with their pets, their children learn this behavior and try to do so. Children always observe their parents actions and imitate them. In addition, the animal hurting augments in these days and many people think that it is a funny thing. Therefore, parents can ameliorate the animals protection by teaching their children implicitly. Let's make a brief explanation about that. For instance, when I was passing of the street last years, I saw some children chased a little-frightened cat and wanted to bother it just for having a fun moment with each other. Hence, the parent can teach their children how to treat with animals and care them by making a close rapport with their pets.

Another noteworthy aspect that should be mentioned is that some kinds of these animals like dogs are strikingly loyal and they may be helpful in the future. Whenever a person grows dogs in their home, these dogs do anything for their owners and his families. Thus, having a good relationship with pets will be some advantages for family members. Let me shed a light on my point. According to the statistics which were published in a well-known site, analysts found out that pets survive the life of about 50 thousands people each year by informing them about the hazards or by protecting them for some dangerous things. Hence, these animals can be very useful for their owners.

In conclusion, there are a plenty of reasons to show that treating in a good way with pets have numerous advantages. Not only, children learn to behave better when they face with animals but also these animals can survive the life of their owners. Consequently, it is imperative that parents behave their pets like other members of their family and try to take care of them.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In todays societies, the question of whether it is a good idea that people treat the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...amilial backgrounds. However, as far as Im concerned, I believe that having a clos...
^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
.... Therefore, parents can ameliorate the animals protection by teaching their children i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... by teaching their children implicitly. Lets make a brief explanation about that. Fo...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79951100244 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54177617663 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520782396088 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.021216796 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.315789474 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5263157895 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34098772303 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113895759556 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070712518407 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230954466275 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401062626075 0.0645574589148 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.