It is evidence that in many countries students do not prefer to choose the studying of science subjects. This trend negatively impacts the technology development of a country put the future prosperity of the nation at the risk.
There are many factor which lead to decrease the number of students who want to study the science subjects. First of all, learning science subjects requires sustained hard work and dealing with some problems is very difficult. Furthermore, scientific knowledge is abstract and theoretical. Thus, instead of science, university students tend to take other major which are really suitable to them.
In addition, science-related jobs include low level salary and it is another reason of the decline number of science graduates. For instance people who working at his own business own 5 or 10 times more than physicists in laboratory.
Meanwhile, this problems shows its influences on society and technology development. Modern society is highly engaged in technology and science is crucial for countries to develop devices and invent new items. Therefore, highly qualified scientists and engineers are largely needed to drive the growth of a nation. If the figures of qualified scientists will decrease, population face some issues which will prevent the technology or society mind from enlarging and it can reduce the number of teacher of professors and it leads us to non-educational world.
In conclusion, the shortage of students choosing science subjects is caused by several factors, and this problem might bring about serious impacts.
- The graph below shows the Alcohol-related deaths in 7 different countries and the average beer consumption in 2005. 73
- It has been observed that in many countries there are not enough students choosing to study science subjects at university. What do you think are causes of the problem? Are there any effects on society? 56
- The two column charts show the percentage of food and other items bought by 3 European countries in 1998 and 2008 73
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics. 73
- People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do advantages outweigh disadvantages? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun factor seems to be countable; consider using: 'many factors'.
Suggestion: many factors
...y of the nation at the risk. There are many factor which lead to decrease the number of st...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 16, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'factors'?
Suggestion: factors
...the nation at the risk. There are many factor which lead to decrease the number of st...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires sustained" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'sustaining' or 'to be sustained'.
Suggestion: sustaining; to be sustained
...all, learning science subjects requires sustained hard work and dealing with some problem...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 12, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... physicists in laboratory. Meanwhile, this problems shows its influences on societ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d it leads us to non-educational world. In conclusion, the shortage of students ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39837398374 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8899322897 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634146341463 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6398527696 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.153846154 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260919674574 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088486402965 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889630014025 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146183184921 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706824592866 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.