Is it more important to work quickly with risks making mistakes than to work slowly with everything correct?
Time and tide waits for no man. No matter what one is engaged in, the concept of time is always a primary concern and decisive factor. Any delay during the progression of a work task might be fatal. On the other hand, quality is also important in a task. To some extent, high speed might incur mistakes and risks, but that does not mean one cannot work with efficiency. From my point of view, it is a better choice to work with speed without neglecting quality.
In the first place, every minute should be made full use of once a task is initiated. A second saved is a second gained. Any intentional delay is a waste of time and might lead to severe consequences. Therefore, a feasible schedule should be drafted and strictly followed. Nobody is allowed to work slowly. In a sense, deadlines that have been settled are the most effective stimulus urging people to concentrate on their work. In most cases, completing a job ahead of time can also give a person that sense of self-fulfillment, thus helping maintain their enthusiasm in the future. Here is a concrete example to testify to the importance of time. My cousin is a person who never works slowly. As a PhD candidate at Northwestern University, he is able to participate in many projects. Last semester he was appointed as the team leader of an emergent project. After working out a suitable timetable, which he strictly adhered to, he and his partners worked efficiently together. The project was completed on time, and with very few mistakes.
Secondly, there is no need to fear making mistakes and taking risks. These experiences are worthwhile and beneficial to future development. Learning from the past help to avoid future blunders. If no mistakes are made, or no risks taken, how can a person have opportunities to improve himself? Thomas Edison, the greatest inventor the world has ever seen, taught us that making mistakes is only a precursor to success. After making numerous experiments and experiencing uncountable failures, he finally succeeded in finding the most suitable material for electric light bulbs.
In the third place, attentiveness and care help reduce the possibility of making mistakes when speed is required. With the mental pressure of time restrictions, one's attention may not be so easily distracted. Immersing himself in the task at hand can help him avoid careless mistakes. Taking this aspect into consideration, speed and quality may not be totally contradictory to one another, but rather complimentary to personal job satisfaction.
To sum up, during the course of an endeavor, all participants should attach great importance to both speed and quality in their plan. All the time spent on one's work should be treasured. Even though there may be encounters with faults or risks, working at a reasonable speed while having focused attention is highly recommended.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-12 | bearguodeguang | 76 | view |
- Are environmental issues too complex to be handled by the individual? 90
- Should people work in the same company or for the same employer for their whole life? 86
- Is it more important to work quickly with risks making mistakes than to work slowly with everything correct? 76
- Parents should not express their disagreements to the teacher if parents find the teaching method incorrect. 93
- Do grades encourage students to learn? 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e mental pressure of time restrictions, ones attention may not be so easily distract...
^^^^
Line 9, column 12, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'during'.
Suggestion: during
...ersonal job satisfaction. To sum up, during the course of an endeavor, all participants should at...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thus, while, in most cases, to sum up, in the first place, in the third place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2395.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01046025105 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87415493984 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575313807531 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6003584229 155% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2471846967 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.84375 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9375 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22662679252 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535527042895 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543125397989 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125915413239 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435308089243 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.