The pie below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010
Given are 2 pie charts comparing the proportion of expenses spent on 5 different categories in 2 nations including Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
In general, it is evident that while Japan individual spent on other products and services the most, housing was spent on the most in Malaysia.
Regarding Japan, the data on other products and services was the highest, at 29%, while that on health care saw a reverse trend, only 3%. Interesting, the figure on for food made up a quarter of the total expenses. Housing and Transport was the same, indicated by 21% and 20%, respectively.
As can be seen from Malaysia’s charts, a majority of family spent on housing, indicated 34%. In terms of other products and services and food, they spent on the same, with the data accounting for 26% and 27%, respectively. 10% of family expenditures was interested in transport and 3% of that was health care, which was the lowest of total expenses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-18 | vuongthaolinh | 85 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | huongab123 | view | |
| 2023-06-19 | mykhanh | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | saminhsn | view | |
| 2023-01-14 | Kaito Mori | view |
- the table below shows the percentage of main types of dwelling in Victoria the Northern Territory and Tasmania Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 94
- the graph below changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 to 2011 73
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. 73
- What, in your opinion, is the reason for this? How can this be balanced?Give reasons for your answer. 73
- the line charts compare how much time it would take for three companies to manufacture a car from 200 to 2012 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86503067485 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8110748111 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0657709675 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.125 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133238393287 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580051592207 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809771203819 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103699266359 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924377905525 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.