Bitcoin News For Today - GURUJITRADING
Analysts are pointing to demand from financial institutions and publicly listed companies as the primary forces behind Bitcoin’s (BTC) sudden retest of its all-time highs.
“The primary reason for the steady grind up in Bitcoin has been the increased interest and aggressive buying activity from institutions,
” said Nick Cote of gamified trading platform Hero Labs. “A lot of investors are going through Grayscale.”
Rising institutional demand can be seen in heavy accumulation by Grayscale’s Bitcoin Trust, with the fund’s BTC holdings exceeding 500,000 earlier this month.
Cote also said that top American companies like Square, Gurujitrading.com
NEM head of trading Nicholas Pelecanos agreed, stating that Bitcoin’s fundamentals are now stronger than ever before, pointing to post-halving supply dynamics, a rise in institutional adoption, and a number of “publicly listed U.S. companies moving 10% of their balance sheet into the asset.”
Pelecanos is now looking to a rise in the altcoin markets, stating, “BTC is back at its all-time high levels, but what is worth noting is the valuation of the altcoins which are on average still 50% below their all-time highs.”
Despite his bullish outlook for alts, Pelecanos warned that many alternative cryptocurrencies have failed to attract meaningful adoption, stating
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-26 | GURUJITRADING.com | 60 | view |
| 2020-11-26 | GURUJITRADING.com | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to attract meaningful adoption, stating www.Gurujitrading.com
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 43.0788530466 21% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 1977.66487455 60% => OK
No of words: 202.0 407.700716846 50% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89108910891 4.8611393121 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 4.48103885553 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22395455189 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.722772277228 0.524837075471 138% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 618.680645161 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 20.6003584229 19% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 50.0 20.1344086022 248% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 255.206778907 48.9658058833 521% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 297.5 100.406767564 296% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 50.5 20.6045352989 245% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.53405017921 198% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0972499847799 0.236089414692 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638205972751 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255254896429 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0380239259125 0.150856017488 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423011900537 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 31.6 11.7677419355 269% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 12.27 58.1214874552 21% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.0 10.1575268817 236% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 17.77 10.9000537634 163% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.28 8.01818996416 141% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 22.0 10.0537634409 219% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.6 Out of 6.0
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.